Congo vs Denmark: Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) over time
- Congo
- Denmark
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0014 kt against 0.0012 kt in Denmark, a difference of 0.0002 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 121st and Denmark ranks 122nd of 164 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0015 kt | 0.001 kt | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0008 kt | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize (corn) — crop residues, Congo or Denmark?
- Congo, at 0.0014 kt against 0.0012 kt in Denmark as of 2050.
- What is the difference in maize (corn) — crop residues between Congo and Denmark?
- 0.0002 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Denmark?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Denmark rank globally for maize (corn) — crop residues?
- Congo ranks 121st and Denmark ranks 122nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).