Martinique vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, annual growth rate

Martinique
85 % change on previous year
in 2006
United Republic of Tanzania
3.11 % change on previous year
in 2023
Martinique rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, annual growth rate over time

  • Martinique
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Martinique currently reports 85 % change on previous year against 3.11 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 81.89 % change on previous year.

That makes Martinique's figure about 27.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Martinique ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 195 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Martinique United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -0.8932 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year 4.23 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0.8022 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year 0.8575 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s -0.9302 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year 3.51 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s -0.8987 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 3.76 % change on previous year 4.65 % change on previous year 0.8915 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, annual growth rate, Martinique or United Republic of Tanzania?
Martinique, at 85 % change on previous year against 3.11 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2006.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions, annual growth rate between Martinique and United Republic of Tanzania?
81.89 % change on previous year, with Martinique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Martinique and United Republic of Tanzania?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do Martinique and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions, annual growth rate?
Martinique ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Martinique vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-annual-growth-rate/martinique/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-annual-growth-rate/martinique/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Martinique vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 13,951 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.