Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions

Argentina
3.68 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand
3.92 kt
in 2050
Argentina rank
29th
Australia and New Zealand rank
27th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
01234196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3.92 kt against 3.68 kt in Argentina, a difference of 0.24 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 29th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 27th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Australia and New Zealand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.58 kt 2.18 kt 0.4033 kt Argentina
1970s 2.94 kt 2.9 kt 0.0352 kt Argentina
1980s 3.08 kt 2.63 kt 0.4449 kt Argentina
1990s 2.62 kt 2.97 kt 0.3538 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 2.41 kt 3.35 kt 0.9442 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 2.88 kt 3.44 kt 0.5605 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 2.93 kt 3.4 kt 0.4757 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 3.37 kt 3.77 kt 0.3977 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 3.68 kt 3.92 kt 0.2428 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 3.92 kt against 3.68 kt in Argentina as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
0.24 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Argentina ranks 29th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 27th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf