Australia and New Zealand vs Caribbean: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)

Australia and New Zealand
3.92 kt
in 2050
Caribbean
4.35 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
34th
Caribbean rank
31st

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Caribbean
1234196120052050

How they compare

Caribbean currently reports 4.35 kt against 3.92 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.43 kt.

That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th and Caribbean ranks 31st of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 8 and Caribbean in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Caribbean Difference Ahead
1960s 2.18 kt 1.67 kt 0.5106 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 2.9 kt 1.9 kt 0.9993 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 2.63 kt 1.73 kt 0.903 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 2.97 kt 1.85 kt 1.12 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 3.35 kt 2.26 kt 1.09 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 3.44 kt 2.5 kt 0.9419 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.4 kt 2.61 kt 0.7906 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 3.77 kt 3.43 kt 0.3404 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 3.92 kt 4.35 kt 0.4277 kt Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Caribbean?
Caribbean, at 4.35 kt against 3.92 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Caribbean?
0.43 kt, with Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Caribbean?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Caribbean rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th and Caribbean ranks 31st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Caribbean: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/caribbean/">Australia and New Zealand vs Caribbean: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf