Australia and New Zealand vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions

Australia and New Zealand
3.92 kt
in 2050
Czechoslovakia
3.61 kt
in 1992
Australia and New Zealand rank
27th
Czechoslovakia rank
30th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Czechoslovakia
01234196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3.92 kt against 3.61 kt in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.31 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 30th of 195 countries.

Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Czechoslovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.18 kt 3.42 kt 1.25 kt Czechoslovakia
1970s 2.9 kt 3.65 kt 0.7447 kt Czechoslovakia
1980s 2.63 kt 4.07 kt 1.44 kt Czechoslovakia
1990s 2.73 kt 3.91 kt 1.18 kt Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Czechoslovakia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 3.92 kt against 3.61 kt in Czechoslovakia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Czechoslovakia?
0.31 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Czechoslovakia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Czechoslovakia rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 30th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/czechoslovakia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/czechoslovakia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf