Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)

Bahamas
0.0424 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.0456 kt
in 2050
Bahamas rank
186th
Eswatini rank
185th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
00.010.020.030.040.05196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0456 kt against 0.0424 kt in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0032 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 186th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0054 kt 0.0177 kt 0.0123 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.0058 kt 0.0211 kt 0.0154 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.0067 kt 0.0236 kt 0.0169 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.0098 kt 0.0261 kt 0.0164 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.011 kt 0.0267 kt 0.0157 kt Eswatini
2010s 0.0119 kt 0.0283 kt 0.0165 kt Eswatini
2020s 0.0123 kt 0.0296 kt 0.0172 kt Eswatini
2030s 0.0232 kt 0.0345 kt 0.0113 kt Eswatini
2050s 0.0424 kt 0.0456 kt 0.0032 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0456 kt against 0.0424 kt in Bahamas as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Bahamas and Eswatini?
0.0032 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Bahamas ranks 186th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf