Barbados vs Botswana: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)

Barbados
0.0632 kt
in 2050
Botswana
0.065 kt
in 2050
Barbados rank
180th
Botswana rank
179th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Barbados
  • Botswana
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.065 kt against 0.0632 kt in Barbados, a difference of 0.0018 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Barbados ranks 180th and Botswana ranks 179th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 kt 0.0324 kt 0.0232 kt Botswana
1970s 0.014 kt 0.0481 kt 0.0341 kt Botswana
1980s 0.02 kt 0.0569 kt 0.0369 kt Botswana
1990s 0.0201 kt 0.0427 kt 0.0226 kt Botswana
2000s 0.0191 kt 0.0386 kt 0.0195 kt Botswana
2010s 0.0229 kt 0.0299 kt 0.007 kt Botswana
2020s 0.026 kt 0.0204 kt 0.0056 kt Barbados
2030s 0.0371 kt 0.0549 kt 0.0178 kt Botswana
2050s 0.0632 kt 0.065 kt 0.0018 kt Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Barbados or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.065 kt against 0.0632 kt in Barbados as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Barbados and Botswana?
0.0018 kt, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Barbados ranks 180th and Botswana ranks 179th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Botswana: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/barbados/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/barbados/botswana/">Barbados vs Botswana: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf