Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions

Central African Republic
0.461 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
0.4804 kt
in 2050
Central African Republic rank
109th
Papua New Guinea rank
107th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Papua New Guinea
00.10.20.30.40.5196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.4804 kt against 0.461 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0194 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0224 kt 0.0702 kt 0.0478 kt Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.0492 kt 0.089 kt 0.0398 kt Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.1155 kt 0.1107 kt 0.0048 kt Central African Republic
1990s 0.1769 kt 0.1527 kt 0.0242 kt Central African Republic
2000s 0.2575 kt 0.204 kt 0.0535 kt Central African Republic
2010s 0.3331 kt 0.2291 kt 0.104 kt Central African Republic
2020s 0.3448 kt 0.2388 kt 0.106 kt Central African Republic
2030s 0.3601 kt 0.3308 kt 0.0293 kt Central African Republic
2050s 0.461 kt 0.4804 kt 0.0194 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.4804 kt against 0.461 kt in Central African Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
0.0194 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Central African Republic ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf