China, Hong Kong SAR vs Naoero: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.0028 kt
in 2050
Naoero
0.0006 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
192nd
Naoero rank
194th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Naoero
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.0028 kt against 0.0006 kt in Naoero, a difference of 0.0022 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 4.7 times Naoero's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 192nd and Naoero ranks 194th of 195 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Naoero Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0301 kt 0.0001 kt 0.03 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0466 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0464 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.0497 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0495 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.0235 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0232 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.0154 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0151 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.0178 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0175 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.0212 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0209 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.0026 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0021 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 0.0028 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0022 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Naoero?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.0028 kt against 0.0006 kt in Naoero as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Naoero?
0.0022 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Naoero?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Naoero rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 192nd and Naoero ranks 194th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Naoero: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/naoero/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Naoero: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf