Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Cuba or Hungary?

Hungary, at 1.3 kt against 1.24 kt in Cuba as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hungary?

65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Hungary: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)

Cuba

1.24 kt

in 2050

Hungary

1.3 kt

in 2050

Cuba rank

78th

Hungary rank

75th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

Cuba
Hungary

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 1.3 kt against 1.24 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.06 kt.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 78th and Hungary ranks 75th of 228 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Hungary	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.7265 kt	2.4 kt	1.68 kt	Hungary
1970s	0.7497 kt	2.62 kt	1.87 kt	Hungary
1980s	0.83 kt	2.77 kt	1.94 kt	Hungary
1990s	0.8165 kt	1.76 kt	0.9441 kt	Hungary
2000s	0.7331 kt	1.43 kt	0.6976 kt	Hungary
2010s	0.7567 kt	1.24 kt	0.4862 kt	Hungary
2020s	0.6079 kt	1.22 kt	0.6093 kt	Hungary
2030s	0.9356 kt	1.37 kt	0.4311 kt	Hungary
2050s	1.24 kt	1.3 kt	0.0585 kt	Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Cuba or Hungary?: Hungary, at 1.3 kt against 1.24 kt in Cuba as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Cuba and Hungary?: 0.06 kt, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hungary?: 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cuba and Hungary rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?: Cuba ranks 78th and Hungary ranks 75th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Hungary: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/cuba/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/cuba/hungary/">Cuba vs Hungary: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf