Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Malta or Tonga?

Malta, at 0.0284 kt against 0.0248 kt in Tonga as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tonga?

65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Tonga: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)

Malta

0.0284 kt

in 2050

Tonga

0.0248 kt

in 2050

Malta rank

191st

Tonga rank

194th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

Malta
Tonga

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0284 kt against 0.0248 kt in Tonga, a difference of 0.0036 kt.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 191st and Tonga ranks 194th of 228 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Tonga	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0134 kt	0.0035 kt	0.01 kt	Malta
1970s	0.0197 kt	0.0066 kt	0.0131 kt	Malta
1980s	0.0267 kt	0.0112 kt	0.0155 kt	Malta
1990s	0.0309 kt	0.0105 kt	0.0204 kt	Malta
2000s	0.0297 kt	0.0104 kt	0.0193 kt	Malta
2010s	0.0205 kt	0.0107 kt	0.0098 kt	Malta
2020s	0.0151 kt	0.0108 kt	0.0043 kt	Malta
2030s	0.0298 kt	0.0167 kt	0.0131 kt	Malta
2050s	0.0284 kt	0.0248 kt	0.0036 kt	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Malta or Tonga?: Malta, at 0.0284 kt against 0.0248 kt in Tonga as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Malta and Tonga?: 0.0036 kt, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tonga?: 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Malta and Tonga rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?: Malta ranks 191st and Tonga ranks 194th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Tonga: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/malta/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/malta/tonga/">Malta vs Tonga: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf