Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions

Papua New Guinea
0.4804 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.4455 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0.10.20.30.40.5196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.4804 kt against 0.4455 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0349 kt.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0702 kt 0.131 kt 0.0608 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 0.089 kt 0.1946 kt 0.1056 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 0.1107 kt 0.1952 kt 0.0845 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1527 kt 0.2174 kt 0.0647 kt Zimbabwe
2000s 0.204 kt 0.2296 kt 0.0255 kt Zimbabwe
2010s 0.2291 kt 0.2412 kt 0.0121 kt Zimbabwe
2020s 0.2388 kt 0.2545 kt 0.0157 kt Zimbabwe
2030s 0.3308 kt 0.3379 kt 0.0071 kt Zimbabwe
2050s 0.4804 kt 0.4455 kt 0.0349 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.4804 kt against 0.4455 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.0349 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Papua New Guinea ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf