Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)

Saudi Arabia
0.4347 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.4455 kt
in 2050
Saudi Arabia rank
132nd
Zimbabwe rank
131st

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.4455 kt against 0.4347 kt in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0108 kt.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0084 kt 0.131 kt 0.1227 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0233 kt 0.1946 kt 0.1713 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0989 kt 0.1952 kt 0.0963 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1717 kt 0.2174 kt 0.0457 kt Zimbabwe
2000s 0.2491 kt 0.2296 kt 0.0196 kt Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.3358 kt 0.2412 kt 0.0946 kt Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.3968 kt 0.2545 kt 0.1423 kt Saudi Arabia
2030s 0.3461 kt 0.3379 kt 0.0082 kt Saudi Arabia
2050s 0.4347 kt 0.4455 kt 0.0108 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.4455 kt against 0.4347 kt in Saudi Arabia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
0.0108 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions?
Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/">Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf