How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?

29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Belarus: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC

Austria

2.06 kt

in 2020

Belarus

2.15 kt

in 2020

Austria rank

17th

Belarus rank

16th

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time

Austria
Belarus

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2.15 kt against 2.06 kt in Austria, a difference of 0.09 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Austria ranks 17th and Belarus ranks 16th of 40 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Belarus	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.41 kt	2.6 kt	0.1836 kt	Belarus
2000s	2.19 kt	2.07 kt	0.1199 kt	Austria
2010s	2.11 kt	2.33 kt	0.2212 kt	Belarus
2020s	2.06 kt	2.15 kt	0.0861 kt	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Austria or Belarus?: Belarus, at 2.15 kt against 2.06 kt in Austria as of 2020.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Austria and Belarus?: 0.09 kt, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions (n2o) — unfccc?: Austria ranks 17th and Belarus ranks 16th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Belarus: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-unfccc/austria/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-n2o-unfccc/austria/belarus/">Austria vs Belarus: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 45 places, 1,349 data points, 1990–2020
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf