Cuba vs Kiribati: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, per square kilometre

Cuba
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
63rd
Kiribati rank
62nd

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Kiribati
0000196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 63rd and Kiribati ranks 62nd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — direct emissions, per square kilometre, Cuba or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — direct emissions, per square kilometre between Cuba and Kiribati?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied to soils — direct emissions, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 63rd and Kiribati ranks 62nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Kiribati: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-direct-emissions-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kiribati/">Cuba vs Kiribati: Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure applied to Soils — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.