Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5)

Bahamas
16.03 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
17.23 kt
in 2050
Bahamas rank
186th
Eswatini rank
185th

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5) over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
051015196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 17.23 kt against 16.03 kt in Bahamas, a difference of 1.2 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 186th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 2.03 kt 6.69 kt 4.65 kt Eswatini
1970s 2.17 kt 7.97 kt 5.8 kt Eswatini
1980s 2.54 kt 8.92 kt 6.39 kt Eswatini
1990s 3.69 kt 9.87 kt 6.19 kt Eswatini
2000s 4.15 kt 10.08 kt 5.94 kt Eswatini
2010s 4.48 kt 10.7 kt 6.22 kt Eswatini
2020s 4.67 kt 11.17 kt 6.5 kt Eswatini
2030s 8.77 kt 13.01 kt 4.24 kt Eswatini
2050s 16.03 kt 17.23 kt 1.19 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), Bahamas or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 17.23 kt against 16.03 kt in Bahamas as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) between Bahamas and Eswatini?
1.2 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq)?
Bahamas ranks 186th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf