Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Central African Republic
174.08 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
181.42 kt
in 2050
Central African Republic rank
109th
Papua New Guinea rank
107th

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Papua New Guinea
050100150200196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 181.42 kt against 174.08 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 7.34 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 8.46 kt 26.51 kt 18.05 kt Papua New Guinea
1970s 18.58 kt 33.59 kt 15.01 kt Papua New Guinea
1980s 43.63 kt 41.8 kt 1.83 kt Central African Republic
1990s 66.79 kt 57.67 kt 9.12 kt Central African Republic
2000s 97.23 kt 77.04 kt 20.19 kt Central African Republic
2010s 125.8 kt 86.51 kt 39.29 kt Central African Republic
2020s 130.21 kt 90.17 kt 40.05 kt Central African Republic
2030s 136 kt 124.92 kt 11.08 kt Central African Republic
2050s 174.08 kt 181.42 kt 7.34 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 181.42 kt against 174.08 kt in Central African Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
7.34 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Central African Republic ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf