Central African Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Central African Republic
174.08 kt
in 2050
Saudi Arabia
164.14 kt
in 2050
Central African Republic rank
109th
Saudi Arabia rank
111th

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Saudi Arabia
050100150196120052050

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 174.08 kt against 164.14 kt in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 9.94 kt.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 109th and Saudi Arabia ranks 111th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 7 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 8.46 kt 3.17 kt 5.29 kt Central African Republic
1970s 18.58 kt 8.81 kt 9.77 kt Central African Republic
1980s 43.63 kt 37.34 kt 6.3 kt Central African Republic
1990s 66.79 kt 64.83 kt 1.96 kt Central African Republic
2000s 97.23 kt 94.07 kt 3.15 kt Central African Republic
2010s 125.8 kt 126.83 kt 1.03 kt Saudi Arabia
2020s 130.21 kt 149.83 kt 19.62 kt Saudi Arabia
2030s 136 kt 130.72 kt 5.27 kt Central African Republic
2050s 174.08 kt 164.14 kt 9.94 kt Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Central African Republic or Saudi Arabia?
Central African Republic, at 174.08 kt against 164.14 kt in Saudi Arabia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Central African Republic and Saudi Arabia?
9.94 kt, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Saudi Arabia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Central African Republic and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Central African Republic ranks 109th and Saudi Arabia ranks 111th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/saudi-arabia/">Central African Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf