Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied to Soils: Emissions … N2O square kilometre CO2eq

Guatemala
0.0044 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
38th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
39th

Manure applied to Soils: Emissions … N2O square kilometre CO2eq over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0044 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 170 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square, Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
Guatemala, at 0.0044 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square?
Guatemala ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.