Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Manure applied to Soils … Manure square kilometre CO2eq

Ecuador
0.002 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0019 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
70th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
73rd

Manure applied to Soils … Manure square kilometre CO2eq over time

  • Ecuador
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0019 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Ecuador ranks 70th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 73rd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Ecuador, at 0.002 kt per square kilometre against 0.0019 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 70th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 73rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.