Portugal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied to Soils … Manure square kilometre CO2eq

Portugal
0.0044 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
37th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
39th

Manure applied to Soils … Manure square kilometre CO2eq over time

  • Portugal
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.0044 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 170 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0042 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0043 kt per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.006 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0055 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0043 kt per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 0.005 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre, Portugal or Sao Tome and Principe?
Portugal, at 0.0044 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre between Portugal and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre?
Portugal ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/portugal/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/portugal/sao-tome-and-principe/">Portugal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.