Austria vs Sudan: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O)
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Austria
- Sudan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 2.09 kt against 1.92 kt in Sudan, a difference of 0.17 kt.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 71st and Sudan ranks 74th of 228 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.15 kt | 1.91 kt | 0.2395 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 1.97 kt | 1.93 kt | 0.0441 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions, Austria or Sudan?
- Austria, at 2.09 kt against 1.92 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions between Austria and Sudan?
- 0.17 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Sudan rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions?
- Austria ranks 71st and Sudan ranks 74th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf