Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions, Congo or Eswatini?

Congo, at 0.0668 kt against 0.065 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?

65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O)

Congo

0.0668 kt

in 2050

Eswatini

0.065 kt

in 2050

Congo rank

184th

Eswatini rank

185th

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O) over time

Congo
Eswatini

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0668 kt against 0.065 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0018 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Congo ranks 184th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0099 kt	0.0252 kt	0.0154 kt	Eswatini
1970s	0.0157 kt	0.0301 kt	0.0143 kt	Eswatini
1980s	0.017 kt	0.0337 kt	0.0167 kt	Eswatini
1990s	0.0225 kt	0.0373 kt	0.0148 kt	Eswatini
2000s	0.0306 kt	0.0381 kt	0.0075 kt	Eswatini
2010s	0.0429 kt	0.0404 kt	0.0025 kt	Congo
2020s	0.0452 kt	0.0421 kt	0.0031 kt	Congo
2030s	0.0477 kt	0.0491 kt	0.0014 kt	Eswatini
2050s	0.0668 kt	0.065 kt	0.0018 kt	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — emissions, Congo or Eswatini?: Congo, at 0.0668 kt against 0.065 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — emissions between Congo and Eswatini?: 0.0018 kt, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?: 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for manure applied to soils — emissions?: Congo ranks 184th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf