Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Cuba
8.41 % change on previous year
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
10 % change on previous year
in 2023
Cuba rank
10th
Equatorial Guinea rank
9th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Cuba
  • Equatorial Guinea
-40-20020196219922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 10 % change on previous year against 8.41 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 1.59 % change on previous year.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 10th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 9th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 3.67 % change on previous year 3.12 % change on previous year 0.5404 % change on previous year Cuba
1970s 0.5711 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1980s -0.7788 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year 2.45 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1990s 1.29 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year 0.1389 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s -0.3014 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year 1.55 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2.12 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s -3.97 % change on previous year 2.5 % change on previous year 6.47 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, annual growth rate, Cuba or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 10 % change on previous year against 8.41 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, annual growth rate between Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
1.59 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, annual growth rate?
Cuba ranks 10th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 9th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-annual-growth-rate/cuba/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-annual-growth-rate/cuba/equatorial-guinea/">Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 13,935 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.