Australia vs Belarus: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions

Australia
1.21 kt
in 2050
Belarus
1.27 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
38th
Belarus rank
37th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
0.511.52196120052050

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 1.27 kt against 1.21 kt in Australia, a difference of 0.06 kt.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 38th and Belarus ranks 37th of 195 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9412 kt 1.59 kt 0.6445 kt Belarus
2000s 1.01 kt 1.23 kt 0.2166 kt Belarus
2010s 1 kt 1.41 kt 0.4085 kt Belarus
2020s 0.9927 kt 1.41 kt 0.4193 kt Belarus
2030s 1.16 kt 1.28 kt 0.1249 kt Belarus
2050s 1.21 kt 1.27 kt 0.0545 kt Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Australia or Belarus?
Belarus, at 1.27 kt against 1.21 kt in Australia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Australia and Belarus?
0.06 kt, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Australia ranks 38th and Belarus ranks 37th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf