Australia vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Australia
1.21 kt
in 2050
Kazakhstan
1.3 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
46th
Kazakhstan rank
43rd

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
00.511.5196120052050

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1.3 kt against 1.21 kt in Australia, a difference of 0.09 kt.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia ranks 46th and Kazakhstan ranks 43rd of 228 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9412 kt 1.26 kt 0.3234 kt Kazakhstan
2000s 1.01 kt 0.8846 kt 0.1299 kt Australia
2010s 1 kt 1.08 kt 0.081 kt Kazakhstan
2020s 0.9927 kt 1.05 kt 0.0589 kt Kazakhstan
2030s 1.16 kt 1.16 kt 0.0062 kt Kazakhstan
2050s 1.21 kt 1.3 kt 0.0864 kt Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 1.3 kt against 1.21 kt in Australia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Australia and Kazakhstan?
0.09 kt, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Australia ranks 46th and Kazakhstan ranks 43rd of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf