Australia vs Peru: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Australia
1.21 kt
in 2050
Peru
1.15 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
46th
Peru rank
48th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Australia
  • Peru
0.40.60.811.2196120052050

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.21 kt against 1.15 kt in Peru, a difference of 0.06 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 46th and Peru ranks 48th of 228 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6522 kt 0.3376 kt 0.3145 kt Australia
1970s 0.9294 kt 0.4083 kt 0.5211 kt Australia
1980s 0.8198 kt 0.4499 kt 0.3699 kt Australia
1990s 0.9207 kt 0.4811 kt 0.4396 kt Australia
2000s 1.01 kt 0.6204 kt 0.3941 kt Australia
2010s 1 kt 0.7491 kt 0.2522 kt Australia
2020s 0.9927 kt 0.8338 kt 0.1589 kt Australia
2030s 1.16 kt 0.946 kt 0.2101 kt Australia
2050s 1.21 kt 1.15 kt 0.0671 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Australia or Peru?
Australia, at 1.21 kt against 1.15 kt in Peru as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Australia and Peru?
0.06 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Peru rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Australia ranks 46th and Peru ranks 48th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Peru: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/peru/">Australia vs Peru: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf