Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Bahamas
0.018 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.0194 kt
in 2050
Bahamas rank
186th
Eswatini rank
185th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0194 kt against 0.018 kt in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0014 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 186th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 kt 0.0075 kt 0.0052 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.0024 kt 0.009 kt 0.0066 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.0028 kt 0.01 kt 0.0072 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.0042 kt 0.0111 kt 0.007 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.0047 kt 0.0113 kt 0.0067 kt Eswatini
2010s 0.005 kt 0.0121 kt 0.007 kt Eswatini
2020s 0.0052 kt 0.0126 kt 0.0073 kt Eswatini
2030s 0.0099 kt 0.0147 kt 0.0048 kt Eswatini
2050s 0.018 kt 0.0194 kt 0.0014 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0194 kt against 0.018 kt in Bahamas as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Bahamas and Eswatini?
0.0014 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Bahamas ranks 186th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf