Barbados vs Botswana: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Barbados
0.0268 kt
in 2050
Botswana
0.0276 kt
in 2050
Barbados rank
180th
Botswana rank
179th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Barbados
  • Botswana
00.010.020.03196120052050

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0276 kt against 0.0268 kt in Barbados, a difference of 0.0008 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Barbados ranks 180th and Botswana ranks 179th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0039 kt 0.0138 kt 0.0098 kt Botswana
1970s 0.0059 kt 0.0204 kt 0.0145 kt Botswana
1980s 0.0085 kt 0.0242 kt 0.0156 kt Botswana
1990s 0.0085 kt 0.0181 kt 0.0096 kt Botswana
2000s 0.0081 kt 0.0164 kt 0.0083 kt Botswana
2010s 0.0098 kt 0.0127 kt 0.003 kt Botswana
2020s 0.0111 kt 0.0087 kt 0.0023 kt Barbados
2030s 0.0158 kt 0.0234 kt 0.0076 kt Botswana
2050s 0.0268 kt 0.0276 kt 0.0008 kt Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Barbados or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.0276 kt against 0.0268 kt in Barbados as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Barbados and Botswana?
0.0008 kt, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Barbados ranks 180th and Botswana ranks 179th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Botswana: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/barbados/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/barbados/botswana/">Barbados vs Botswana: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf