Belarus vs Belgium-Luxembourg: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions over time
- Belarus
- Belgium-Luxembourg
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 1.27 kt against 1.27 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 37th and Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 36th of 195 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Belarus or Belgium-Luxembourg?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 1.27 kt against 1.27 kt in Belarus as of 1999.
- What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Belarus and Belgium-Luxembourg?
- 0 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Belgium-Luxembourg?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belarus and Belgium-Luxembourg rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
- Belarus ranks 37th and Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 36th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf