Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions

Central African Republic
0.1959 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
0.2042 kt
in 2050
Central African Republic rank
109th
Papua New Guinea rank
107th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Papua New Guinea
00.050.10.150.2196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.2042 kt against 0.1959 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0083 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0095 kt 0.0299 kt 0.0203 kt Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.0209 kt 0.0378 kt 0.0169 kt Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0491 kt 0.0471 kt 0.002 kt Central African Republic
1990s 0.0752 kt 0.0649 kt 0.0103 kt Central African Republic
2000s 0.1094 kt 0.0867 kt 0.0227 kt Central African Republic
2010s 0.1416 kt 0.0974 kt 0.0442 kt Central African Republic
2020s 0.1466 kt 0.1015 kt 0.0451 kt Central African Republic
2030s 0.1531 kt 0.1406 kt 0.0125 kt Central African Republic
2050s 0.1959 kt 0.2042 kt 0.0083 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.2042 kt against 0.1959 kt in Central African Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
0.0083 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Central African Republic ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf