China, Macao SAR vs Kiribati: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions

China, Macao SAR
0.0039 kt
in 2050
Kiribati
0.0058 kt
in 2050
China, Macao SAR rank
177th
Kiribati rank
174th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Kiribati
00.0020.0040.006196120052050

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0058 kt against 0.0039 kt in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 0.0019 kt.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times China, Macao SAR's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

China, Macao SAR ranks 177th and Kiribati ranks 174th of 195 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0003 kt Kiribati
1970s 0.0005 kt 0.0008 kt 0.0003 kt Kiribati
1980s 0.0007 kt 0.0009 kt 0.0003 kt Kiribati
1990s 0.0007 kt 0.0011 kt 0.0004 kt Kiribati
2000s 0.001 kt 0.0017 kt 0.0007 kt Kiribati
2010s 0.0011 kt 0.0021 kt 0.0011 kt Kiribati
2020s 0.0011 kt 0.0023 kt 0.0012 kt Kiribati
2030s 0.0022 kt 0.0034 kt 0.0012 kt Kiribati
2050s 0.0039 kt 0.0058 kt 0.0019 kt Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, China, Macao SAR or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.0058 kt against 0.0039 kt in China, Macao SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between China, Macao SAR and Kiribati?
0.0019 kt, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Kiribati?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Macao SAR and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
China, Macao SAR ranks 177th and Kiribati ranks 174th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Kiribati: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/kiribati/">China, Macao SAR vs Kiribati: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf