Congo vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Congo
0.0199 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.0194 kt
in 2050
Congo rank
184th
Eswatini rank
185th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0199 kt against 0.0194 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0005 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Congo ranks 184th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 kt 0.0075 kt 0.0046 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.0047 kt 0.009 kt 0.0043 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.0051 kt 0.01 kt 0.005 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.0067 kt 0.0111 kt 0.0044 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.0091 kt 0.0113 kt 0.0022 kt Eswatini
2010s 0.0128 kt 0.0121 kt 0.0007 kt Congo
2020s 0.0135 kt 0.0126 kt 0.0009 kt Congo
2030s 0.0142 kt 0.0147 kt 0.0005 kt Eswatini
2050s 0.0199 kt 0.0194 kt 0.0005 kt Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Congo or Eswatini?
Congo, at 0.0199 kt against 0.0194 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Congo and Eswatini?
0.0005 kt, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Congo ranks 184th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf