Ecuador vs Peru: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Ecuador
0.9379 kt
in 2050
Peru
1.15 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
51st
Peru rank
48th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
0.20.40.60.811.2196120052050

How they compare

Peru currently reports 1.15 kt against 0.9379 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2121 kt.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Ecuador ranks 51st and Peru ranks 48th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2646 kt 0.3376 kt 0.073 kt Peru
1970s 0.3967 kt 0.4083 kt 0.0116 kt Peru
1980s 0.4633 kt 0.4499 kt 0.0134 kt Ecuador
1990s 0.5368 kt 0.4811 kt 0.0558 kt Ecuador
2000s 0.5645 kt 0.6204 kt 0.0559 kt Peru
2010s 0.6003 kt 0.7491 kt 0.1488 kt Peru
2020s 0.5574 kt 0.8338 kt 0.2764 kt Peru
2030s 0.8279 kt 0.946 kt 0.1181 kt Peru
2050s 0.9379 kt 1.15 kt 0.2076 kt Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 1.15 kt against 0.9379 kt in Ecuador as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Ecuador and Peru?
0.2121 kt, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Ecuador ranks 51st and Peru ranks 48th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Peru: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/peru/">Ecuador vs Peru: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf