Latin America and the Caribbean vs Mexico: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions

Latin America and the Caribbean
32.37 kt
in 2050
Mexico
4.05 kt
in 2050
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
9th
Mexico rank
12th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Mexico
0102030196120052050

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 32.37 kt against 4.05 kt in Mexico, a difference of 28.32 kt.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 8.0 times Mexico's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 12th of 32 groups.

Latin America and the Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 11.01 kt 1.33 kt 9.68 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1970s 14.19 kt 1.92 kt 12.27 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1980s 17.1 kt 2.62 kt 14.49 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1990s 18.93 kt 2.52 kt 16.41 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2000s 21.64 kt 2.8 kt 18.84 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2010s 24.27 kt 3.13 kt 21.14 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2020s 24.75 kt 3.53 kt 21.22 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2030s 28.91 kt 3.56 kt 25.35 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2050s 32.37 kt 4.05 kt 28.32 kt Latin America and the Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Latin America and the Caribbean or Mexico?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 32.37 kt against 4.05 kt in Mexico as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Latin America and the Caribbean and Mexico?
28.32 kt, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and Mexico?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean and Mexico rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 12th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean vs Mexico: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/mexico/">Latin America and the Caribbean vs Mexico: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf