Mauritius vs Palestine, State of: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions

Mauritius
0.0102 kt
in 2050
Palestine, State of
0.0105 kt
in 2050
Mauritius rank
167th
Palestine, State of rank
164th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • Mauritius
  • Palestine, State of
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196120052050

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 0.0105 kt against 0.0102 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0003 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 167th and Palestine, State of ranks 164th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Palestine, State of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0051 kt 0.0067 kt 0.0016 kt Palestine, State of
2000s 0.0068 kt 0.0083 kt 0.0015 kt Palestine, State of
2010s 0.0092 kt 0.0068 kt 0.0024 kt Mauritius
2020s 0.0101 kt 0.006 kt 0.0041 kt Mauritius
2030s 0.0095 kt 0.0093 kt 0.0002 kt Mauritius
2050s 0.0102 kt 0.0105 kt 0.0003 kt Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Mauritius or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 0.0105 kt against 0.0102 kt in Mauritius as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Mauritius and Palestine, State of?
0.0003 kt, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Palestine, State of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2050.
How do Mauritius and Palestine, State of rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Mauritius ranks 167th and Palestine, State of ranks 164th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Palestine, State of: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mauritius/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mauritius/west-bank-and-gaza/">Mauritius vs Palestine, State of: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf