Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Saudi Arabia
0.1847 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.1893 kt
in 2050
Saudi Arabia rank
132nd
Zimbabwe rank
131st

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.150.2196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1893 kt against 0.1847 kt in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0046 kt.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0036 kt 0.0557 kt 0.0521 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0099 kt 0.0827 kt 0.0728 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 0.042 kt 0.0829 kt 0.041 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 0.073 kt 0.0924 kt 0.0194 kt Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1059 kt 0.0976 kt 0.0083 kt Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.1427 kt 0.1025 kt 0.0402 kt Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.1686 kt 0.1081 kt 0.0605 kt Saudi Arabia
2030s 0.1471 kt 0.1436 kt 0.0035 kt Saudi Arabia
2050s 0.1847 kt 0.1893 kt 0.0046 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1893 kt against 0.1847 kt in Saudi Arabia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
0.0046 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions?
Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/">Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf