Mauritius vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied to Soils: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square

Mauritius
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
32nd
Uzbekistan rank
33rd

Manure applied to Soils: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Uzbekistan
00000196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 32nd and Uzbekistan ranks 33rd of 170 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Uzbekistan?
Mauritius, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Uzbekistan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 32nd and Uzbekistan ranks 33rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/uzbekistan/">Mauritius vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.