How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP

Costa Rica

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Costa Rica rank

78th

Zimbabwe rank

77th

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time

Costa Rica
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
1970s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied to soils — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp?: Costa Rica ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/costa-rica/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-to-soils-indirect-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/costa-rica/zimbabwe/">Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 170 places, 9,139 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 17 August 2026

Manure applied to Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.