Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions

Argentina
90.78 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand
122.94 kt
in 2050
Argentina rank
7th
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
050100150196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 122.94 kt against 90.78 kt in Argentina, a difference of 32.16 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Argentina's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 7th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 195 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 69.17 kt 114.39 kt 45.22 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 77.87 kt 131.78 kt 53.91 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 73.89 kt 121.79 kt 47.91 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 70.18 kt 118.4 kt 48.22 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 74.08 kt 108.88 kt 34.8 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 70.23 kt 98.51 kt 28.28 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 72.37 kt 93.26 kt 20.89 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 88.52 kt 121.14 kt 32.61 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 90.78 kt 122.94 kt 32.16 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 122.94 kt against 90.78 kt in Argentina as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
32.16 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Argentina ranks 7th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf