Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions

Australia and New Zealand
122.94 kt
in 2050
Ethiopia
80.26 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th
Ethiopia rank
9th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Ethiopia
406080100120140196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 122.94 kt against 80.26 kt in Ethiopia, a difference of 42.68 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Ethiopia ranks 9th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 115.86 kt 46.93 kt 68.92 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 108.88 kt 63.04 kt 45.84 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 98.51 kt 91.96 kt 6.55 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 93.26 kt 112.06 kt 18.8 kt Ethiopia
2030s 121.14 kt 73.88 kt 47.26 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 122.94 kt 80.26 kt 42.68 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Ethiopia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 122.94 kt against 80.26 kt in Ethiopia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
42.68 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Ethiopia ranks 9th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf