Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Zimbabwe: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
14.48 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
16.92 kt
in 2050
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
48th
Zimbabwe rank
45th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Zimbabwe
5101520196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16.92 kt against 14.48 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 2.44 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5.14 kt 5.22 kt 0.0863 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 7.33 kt 8.14 kt 0.8129 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 9.3 kt 7.81 kt 1.49 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1990s 9.98 kt 7.77 kt 2.21 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2000s 12.64 kt 8.26 kt 4.39 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 15.63 kt 8.66 kt 6.96 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s 17.67 kt 8.96 kt 8.71 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2030s 13.78 kt 12.67 kt 1.11 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2050s 14.48 kt 16.92 kt 2.44 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 16.92 kt against 14.48 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Zimbabwe?
2.44 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Zimbabwe: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/zimbabwe/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Zimbabwe: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf