China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.0041 kt
in 2050
Kiribati
0.0007 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
221st
Kiribati rank
223rd

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Kiribati
00.010.020.030.040.05196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.0041 kt against 0.0007 kt in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0034 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 5.9 times Kiribati's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 221st and Kiribati ranks 223rd of 228 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0274 kt 0 kt 0.0274 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0408 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0407 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.0445 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0444 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.0256 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0255 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.0107 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0105 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.0191 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0189 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.0264 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0262 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.0036 kt 0.0004 kt 0.0032 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 0.0041 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0034 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Kiribati?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.0041 kt against 0.0007 kt in Kiribati as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
0.0034 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 221st and Kiribati ranks 223rd of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf