China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.0041 kt
in 2050
Malta
0.015 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
189th
Malta rank
187th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Malta
00.010.020.030.040.05196120052050

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.015 kt against 0.0041 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0109 kt.

That makes Malta's figure about 3.7 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Malta ranks 187th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0274 kt 0.0158 kt 0.0116 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0408 kt 0.0128 kt 0.028 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.0445 kt 0.0122 kt 0.0323 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.0256 kt 0.018 kt 0.0075 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.0107 kt 0.0158 kt 0.0052 kt Malta
2010s 0.0191 kt 0.0131 kt 0.006 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.0264 kt 0.0126 kt 0.0137 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.0036 kt 0.016 kt 0.0124 kt Malta
2050s 0.0041 kt 0.015 kt 0.0109 kt Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Malta?
Malta, at 0.015 kt against 0.0041 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
0.0109 kt, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Malta ranks 187th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/malta/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf