China, Macao SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

China, Macao SAR
0.0151 kt
in 2050
Malta
0.015 kt
in 2050
China, Macao SAR rank
218th
Malta rank
219th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Malta
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.0151 kt against 0.015 kt in Malta, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 218th and Malta ranks 219th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0016 kt 0.0158 kt 0.0142 kt Malta
1970s 0.0021 kt 0.0128 kt 0.0107 kt Malta
1980s 0.0026 kt 0.0122 kt 0.0096 kt Malta
1990s 0.0028 kt 0.018 kt 0.0153 kt Malta
2000s 0.0038 kt 0.0158 kt 0.0121 kt Malta
2010s 0.004 kt 0.0131 kt 0.009 kt Malta
2020s 0.0043 kt 0.0126 kt 0.0083 kt Malta
2030s 0.0084 kt 0.016 kt 0.0076 kt Malta
2050s 0.0151 kt 0.015 kt 0.0001 kt China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, China, Macao SAR or Malta?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.0151 kt against 0.015 kt in Malta as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between China, Macao SAR and Malta?
0.0001 kt, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Malta?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Macao SAR and Malta rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
China, Macao SAR ranks 218th and Malta ranks 219th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/malta/">China, Macao SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf