Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs El Salvador: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2.82 kt
in 2050
El Salvador
2.87 kt
in 2050
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
112th
El Salvador rank
111th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • El Salvador
0.511.522.53196120052050

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 2.87 kt against 2.82 kt in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.05 kt.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 112th and El Salvador ranks 111th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.59 kt 1.45 kt 0.8621 kt El Salvador
1970s 0.7706 kt 1.43 kt 0.6615 kt El Salvador
1980s 1.04 kt 1.31 kt 0.2721 kt El Salvador
1990s 0.9002 kt 1.47 kt 0.571 kt El Salvador
2000s 1.25 kt 1.6 kt 0.3509 kt El Salvador
2010s 1.42 kt 1.25 kt 0.1755 kt Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2020s 1.44 kt 0.969 kt 0.4737 kt Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2030s 2.17 kt 2.2 kt 0.0272 kt El Salvador
2050s 2.82 kt 2.87 kt 0.0502 kt El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 2.87 kt against 2.82 kt in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and El Salvador?
0.05 kt, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and El Salvador?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and El Salvador rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 112th and El Salvador ranks 111th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs El Salvador: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/el-salvador/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs El Salvador: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf