Ecuador vs Mauritania: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

Ecuador
11.12 kt
in 2050
Mauritania
10.54 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
64th
Mauritania rank
66th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
24681012196120052050

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 11.12 kt against 10.54 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0.58 kt.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 64th and Mauritania ranks 66th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.98 kt 4.66 kt 1.68 kt Mauritania
1970s 3.6 kt 3.61 kt 0.007 kt Mauritania
1980s 5.02 kt 3.69 kt 1.33 kt Ecuador
1990s 6.98 kt 4.39 kt 2.59 kt Ecuador
2000s 6.92 kt 5.84 kt 1.08 kt Ecuador
2010s 6.48 kt 6.81 kt 0.3299 kt Mauritania
2020s 5.7 kt 7.38 kt 1.68 kt Mauritania
2030s 9.55 kt 8.63 kt 0.9189 kt Ecuador
2050s 11.12 kt 10.54 kt 0.5781 kt Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Ecuador, at 11.12 kt against 10.54 kt in Mauritania as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Ecuador and Mauritania?
0.58 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Ecuador ranks 64th and Mauritania ranks 66th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf