Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0246 kt
in 2050
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0259 kt
in 2050
Equatorial Guinea rank
212th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
211th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.0050.010.0150.020.025196120052050

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0259 kt against 0.0246 kt in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0013 kt.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 212th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 211th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 8 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0111 kt 0.0064 kt 0.0047 kt Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0138 kt 0.0054 kt 0.0083 kt Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0161 kt 0.0071 kt 0.0089 kt Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.018 kt 0.0095 kt 0.0085 kt Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0193 kt 0.0108 kt 0.0085 kt Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0206 kt 0.0074 kt 0.0132 kt Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0214 kt 0.0078 kt 0.0136 kt Equatorial Guinea
2030s 0.0215 kt 0.0165 kt 0.005 kt Equatorial Guinea
2050s 0.0246 kt 0.0259 kt 0.0013 kt Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0259 kt against 0.0246 kt in Equatorial Guinea as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0013 kt, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 212th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 211th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf