Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

Eswatini
1.35 kt
in 2050
Guinea-Bissau
1.25 kt
in 2050
Eswatini rank
133rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
136th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
0.250.50.7511.2196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.35 kt against 1.25 kt in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.1 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 133rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 136th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7532 kt 0.3446 kt 0.4086 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.873 kt 0.3926 kt 0.4804 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.933 kt 0.5128 kt 0.4202 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.9674 kt 0.6984 kt 0.269 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.8646 kt 0.877 kt 0.0123 kt Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.8935 kt 1.15 kt 0.2562 kt Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.8474 kt 1.23 kt 0.3827 kt Guinea-Bissau
2030s 1.15 kt 1.07 kt 0.0852 kt Eswatini
2050s 1.35 kt 1.25 kt 0.0942 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Eswatini, at 1.35 kt against 1.25 kt in Guinea-Bissau as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
0.1 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Eswatini ranks 133rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 136th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf