Eswatini vs Jordan: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)

Eswatini
1.35 kt
in 2050
Jordan
1.36 kt
in 2050
Eswatini rank
133rd
Jordan rank
132nd

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Jordan
0.250.50.7511.2196120052050

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1.36 kt against 1.35 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.01 kt.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 133rd and Jordan ranks 132nd of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7532 kt 0.4392 kt 0.314 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.873 kt 0.4438 kt 0.4292 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.933 kt 0.5223 kt 0.4107 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.9674 kt 0.8542 kt 0.1132 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.8646 kt 0.8328 kt 0.0318 kt Eswatini
2010s 0.8935 kt 1.1 kt 0.209 kt Jordan
2020s 0.8474 kt 1.23 kt 0.3837 kt Jordan
2030s 1.15 kt 1.05 kt 0.1047 kt Eswatini
2050s 1.35 kt 1.36 kt 0.011 kt Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Eswatini or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1.36 kt against 1.35 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Eswatini and Jordan?
0.01 kt, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Eswatini ranks 133rd and Jordan ranks 132nd of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Jordan: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/jordan/">Eswatini vs Jordan: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf